Application of Artificial Intelligence as a Support Tool in Internal Audits of Clinical Laboratories Accordingto ISO 15189:2022
pdf (Spanish)

Keywords

Quality
Internal Audit
Artificial Intelligence
Prompt
ISO 15189
ChatGPT

How to Cite

Application of Artificial Intelligence as a Support Tool in Internal Audits of Clinical Laboratories Accordingto ISO 15189:2022. (2026). Biochemistry and Clinical Pathology Journal, 90(3), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.62073/20syw120

Abstract

Introduction: Internal audits in clinical laboratories are a fundamental quality component according to ISO 15189:2022 “Medical laboratories — Requirements for quality and competence”. Artificial Intelligence (AI) shows potential as a support tool for this process. Objective: To evaluate the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) as a tool for technical writing, classification (nonconformity/compliance/opportunity for improvement), and normative referencing of internal audit findings based on ISO 15189:2022, within a structured methodological framework validated by expert auditors. Materials and Methods: An LLM (ChatGPT) was employed, using a structured interaction strategy based on the ASPECCT method. Tool performance was assessed using 39 previous internal audit findings. Two human auditors independently evaluated the AI using predefined criteria: finding classification, technical writing, normative referencing, compliance with constraints, and capacity for improvement through successive iterations. Results: The AI interaction was successfully developed within the ASPECCT methodological framework. Expert auditors demonstrated high inter-rater agreement: 97.65% for the overall assessment and 100% for finding classification. In addition, 99.23% of the ratings were categorized as “good” (21.37%) or “excellent” (77.86%), and 64.1% of the initial AI results required no corrections. Discussion: AI, within a structured methodological framework and under human supervision, constitutes a valuable tool for internal audits, contributing to increased standardization and time optimization.

pdf (Spanish)

References

1. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 15189:2022. Medical laboratories — Requirements for quality and competence. 4th ed. Geneva: ISO; 2022. Disponible en: https://www.iso.org/standard/76677.html (consultado el 14 Febrero de 2026).

2. Instituto Argentino de Normalización y Certificación. IRAM-ISO 15189:2022. Laboratorios clínicos. Requisitos para la calidad y la competencia. 4ª ed. Buenos Aires: IRAM; 2022. Disponible en: https://catalogo.iram.org.ar/#/normas/detalles/9417

3. Chambers R. The true cost of an internal audit is often a well-kept secret [Internet]. Audit Beacon; 2025 [citado 29 Ene 2026]. Disponible en: https://www.richardchambers.com/the-true-cost-of-an-internalaudit-is-often-a-well-kept-secret/

4. Lapić I, Rogić D, Ivić M. Laboratory professionals’ attitudes towards ISO 15189:2012 accreditation: an anonymous survey of three Croatian accredited medical laboratories. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021;31(2):020712, https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.020712

5. García Castro L. Inteligencia Artificial y el trabajo del auditor. Madrid: Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales; 2024. Disponible en: https://repositorio.comillas.edu/jspui/bitstream/11531/79355/4/TFG%20-%20Garcia%20Castro%2c%20Luis.pdf

6. Alassuli A. Impact of artificial intelligence using the robotic process automation system on the efficiency of internal audit operations at Jordanian commercial banks. Banks Bank Syst. 2025;20(1):122-35, http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.20(1).2025.11

7. OpenAI. ChatGPT (modelo GPT-5.2 Thinking) [Internet]. San Francisco: OpenAI; 2026 [citado 25 Ene 2026]. Disponible en: https://www.openai.com

8. Suyono WP, Puspa ES, Anugrah S, Firnanda R. Artificial intelligence in auditing: a systematic review of tools, applications, and challenges. J Artif Intell Digit Bus. 2025;4(2):3393-401, https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i2.1024

9. Kokina J, Davenport TH. The emergence of artificial intelligence: how automation is changing auditing. J Emerg Technol Account. 2017;14(1):115-22, https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-51730

10. Kurreck C, Castaños-Vélez E, Freyer D, Blumenau S, Przesdzing I, Bernard R, et al. Improving quality of preclinical academic research through auditing: a feasibility study. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0230813, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240719

11. The Institute of Internal Auditors. Artificial intelligence auditing framework. Lake Mary, FL: The Institute of Internal Auditors; 2024. Disponible en: https://www.theiia.org/globalassets/site/content/tools/professional/aiframework-sept-2024-update.pdf