Abstract
Introduction: Anaerobic bacteria occupy different ecological niches and regulate the innate immune response of the host; however, some of them are considered opportunistic pathogens as they can invade and cause damage. Objective: To determine the prevalence of anaerobic bacteria in clinical samples from both hospitalized and ambulatory patients at the Dr. J.C. Perrando Hospital, located in the city of Resistencia (Chaco, Argentina), during the period April 2017 - August 2018. Materials and methods: A retrospective observational and prospective experimental study was carried out, identifying samples sent for culture in anaerobiosis. Results: Four hundred and nineteen samples from different services of this hospital were analyzed. The presence of anaerobic microorganisms was determined in forty-six of them (11%), predominantly female patient samples (88%), taken from uterine cavities (33%) and surgical wounds (23%), and from the gynecology room (66%). Only 7% of the Gram stains were compatible with anaerobes and 13% yielded positive bacterial cultures; of the latter, 86% corresponded to strictly anaerobic bacteria. The genus most frequently isolated was Prevotella spp. (56%), predominantly from gynecological simples (66%). Conclusion: This study revealed an eleven percent prevalence of anaerobic bacteria in clinical samples from one of the main public hospitals in northeastern Argentina, and Prevotella spp. highlighted as an opportunistic pathogen to be considered to adapt empirical treatment to the local epidemiological profile.
References
Nagy E, Schuetz A. Is there a need for the antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria? Anaerobe. 2015; 31:2-3. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.11.002
Fernandez Canigia L. Infecciones asociadas a bacterias anaerobias. Diagnóstico, identificación y estudio de sensibilidad. Vol. 2. Argentina: Cursos a Distancia sobre Microbiología Clínica; 2017. p. 1–20.
Predari SC. Microorganismos anaerobios. In: Predari SC, editor. Manual de microbiología clínica de la Asociación Argentina de Microbiología. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Asociación Argentina de Microbiología; 2016. p. 1-305. [Consultado 08 abr 2023]. Disponible en: http://www.aam.org.ar/descarga-archivos/Parte III.pdf
Legaria MC, Bianchini HM, Castello L, Carloni G, Di Martino A, Fernández Canigia L, et al. Primer consenso Argentino para el estudio de la sensibilidad in vitro a los antimicrobianos de las bacterias anaerobias de importancia clínica en humanos. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2011;43(1): 51–66.
Solano Alpízar LB. Epidemiología de bacterias anaerobias aisladas en muestras clínicas en el hospital san juan de dios, San José, Costa Rica, durante el trienio 2014, 2015 y 2016. Rev Costarric Salud Pública. 2018;27(2): 82–92.
Quesada Gómez C, Rodríguez Cavallini E, Gamboa Coronado M del M. Anaerobic bacteria in clinical samples from adult patients treated in a regional hospital in Costa Rica. Rev Biomédica. 2007;18(2):89–95. Disponible en: http://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumenI.cgi?IDARTICULO=21403
Cobo F, Guillot V, Navarro Marí JM. Breast abscesses caused by anaerobic microorganisms:
Clinical and microbiological characteristics. Antibiotics. 2020;9(6): 1–7.
Shenoy PA, Vishwanath S, Gawda A, Shetty S, Anegundi R, Varma M, et al. Anaerobic bacteria in clinical specimens – frequent, but a neglected lot: A five year experience at a tertiary care hospital. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2017; 11(7): DC44–8.
Paiva M, Cogo LL, Kussen GMB, Lima MEM, Souza HAPHM, Rosa AR, et al. Bacterias anaeróbias em processos infecciosos: ocorrência e significado clínico. Brazilian Journal of Clinical Analyses (RBAC). 2016;48(3):103–8. Disponible en: http://sbac.org.br/rbac/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/RBAC_-2016-supl.-01-completa-corrigida.pdf
García JJ, Tomás JJG, Rodríguez JC. Carta al Director Hacia el tratamiento empírico de elección en las infecciones por anaerobios. Off J Spanish Soc Chemother. 2018;31(5): 455–6.
Clara L, Rodriguez VM, Saúl P, Dominguez C, Esteban M. Infecciones intraabdominales. Puesta al día y recomendaciones de la sociedad Argentina de infectología. Med (Buenos Aires). 2018;78(N°6):417–26. En: http://www.medicinabuenosaires.com/PMID/30504109.pdf
Snydman DR, Jacobus N V., McDermott LA, Golan Y, Hecht DW, Goldstein EJC, et al. Lessons learned from the anaerobe survey historical perspective and review of the most recent data (2005-2007). Clin Infect Dis. 2010; 50 (SUPP.1).
Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Approved standard 8th Edition M11-A8; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2012. [Consutado 08 04 2023]. Disponible en: https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/documents/m11/
